Windows 7 M1 Released :omg:

Post by **remi.serriere** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:00 pm

Well... Maybe you should ask to Microsoft to be hired... Maybe you should work with the Seven Project Manager...

Post by **remi.serriere** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:27 pm

Well... I found an interresting post on Chris123NT's blog...

One thing I will say first and foremost. For all the non-believers out there, these screenshots and videos are indeed real. What you are seeing is the real M1 build of Windows 7. How do I know? Well you’ll just have to take my word for it (no I don’t have the build so DON’T ASK ME FOR IT).

Read more here

Post by **logicaL** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:43 pm

TG Daily seems to have gotten more information about this... it requires Vista SP1 to install. Granted its not from any of TG's known authors, his nickname (instead of real name) is "JayDog"

Link

Post by **Frozenport** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:57 am

If we look at longhorn's devolpement we see that the first steps are to detach system integration (for example make it a .net program). Later we see more experimental kernel features added (Memory management, ready boost, new drivers). Then the whole system is recomponentized (although the extent of this has been minimal in recent releases)...

In regards to logical progression, this seems about right.

Post by **Derf** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:30 pm

More screenshots.

http://translate.google.com/translate?u ... u&ie=UTF-8

Interesting - more sources appear to be getting it. Maybe we'll see a leak after all?

Post by **logicaL** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:04 pm

Maybe.... maybe not. We still don't know the validity of any of these screenshots.

I think its ironic though that this website is called WhatsNext, while the other one was ThinkNext. And it still has some of the discrepancy's that I pointed out before...

Post by **hounsell** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:30 pm

I think this one is more trustworthy. Its ran by the people from thevista.ru, written by none other than betaarchive member, raiker...

Post by **m4rkuz** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:14 pm

Raiker has it , but wont share

Thats sooo unfair, lets hate him

Post by **Daniel** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:26 pm

m4rkuz wrote:Raiker has it , but wont share

Thats sooo unfair, lets hate him

LOL.

Post by **kichimi** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:02 pm

SHUN THE NON BELIEVER!!! SHUUNN!!

Post by **hypr** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:03 pm

hehe guess we will have to be patient with it, sooner or later it will be leaked.

Post by **Chicago** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:09 pm

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1285&tag=nl.e539

Post by **gracz54** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:00 pm

I am REALLY puzzled why didn't it leak yet.

Post by **fzajac** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:47 pm

gracz54 wrote:I am REALLY puzzled why didn't it leak yet.

Maybe MS learned to choose more trusted testers...
Just people dont want to loose their tester status, if MS found out who leaked it they would sure ban the tester...

Post by **XDude** » Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:35 pm

FiFi wrote:
gracz54 wrote:I am REALLY puzzled why didn't it leak yet.
Maybe MS learned to choose more trusted testers...
Just people dont want to loose their tester status, if MS found out who leaked it they would sure ban the tester...

actually, its a smaller group that are closer with microsoft than public testers
and not 13 years old kids which enjoy and feel pride for leaking stuff

Post by **m4rkuz** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:36 pm

*UPDATE*

M2 was released in the first week of April.

I got the build tag ( thx to Raiker ) but I dunno if Iam allowed to post it^^

Post by **Pureelite** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:28 pm

m4rkuz wrote:*UPDATE*

M2 was released in the first week of April.

I got the build tag ( thx to Raiker ) but I dunno if Iam allowed to post it^^

Doesent that make your just like Raiker, Not sharing things?

Post by **Dr Eggman** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:02 am

Well c'mon.

At least if we don't get a screenie at least teh build tag (or some of it!!)

Post by **hounsell** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:12 am

It's a build tag, and you are treating it as if its a whole build.

Fortunately, I'm not like that, and this is what I have been hearing:
6.1.6568.1 (winmain.080312-1858)

I was expecting this to be a 7.0.xxxx build though, cos isn't M2 supposed to bring the new kernel?

Post by **logicaL** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:48 am

hounsell wrote:It's a build tag, and you are treating it as if its a whole build.

Fortunately, I'm not like that, and this is what I have been hearing:
6.1.6568.1 (winmain.080312-1858)

I was expecting this to be a 7.0.xxxx build though, cos isn't M2 supposed to bring the new kernel?

Nobody knows. I'm still skeptical about any leaked details. Not to offend Raiker, but until we at least see something true its up to him (or whoever) to produce something (a real screenshot, or build etc) or this is all just wishful thinking.

Post by **XDude** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:48 am

hounsell wrote:It's a build tag, and you are treating it as if its a whole build.

Fortunately, I'm not like that, and this is what I have been hearing:
6.1.6568.1 (winmain.080312-1858)

I was expecting this to be a 7.0.xxxx build though, cos isn't M2 supposed to bring the new kernel?

Maybe it's M3 that will bring a new kernel.
And as we expect, this build problary wouldn't be leaking either

Post by **Raiker** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:19 am

Fortunately, I'm not like that, and this is what I have been hearing

If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch

Post by **hounsell** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:06 pm

Raiker wrote:
Fortunately, I'm not like that, and this is what I have been hearing
If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch

Still, shouldn't the person who claims to see, help them find their way?
Or are they too much of an arrogant [censored] to help out, and would rather poke fun at those who are blind?

I never said it was fact, I said that is what I heard. I have no way of verifying it. But if you know better, why not tell people. Its not even screens, its a build tag. It is of no real value at all.

Post by **Pureelite** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:20 pm

I am quite surprised about the build tag, I thought it would have been 7.0xxxxxxxxxxx

Well now I just want M3. Maybe it wasnt a complete build but a bug fix with updated build tag?

Post by **Tootles** » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:49 pm

Wasn't that the conclusion to which we'd already come?