Windows Server 2008 RC0 released today
-
jwborc39963
Windows Server 2008 RC0 released today
I dont have access to anyone's FTPs, but im sure someone has it already. I am downloading it from connect at about 2MBps (gotta love college!).
- Vista Ultimate R2
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm
It's also available to non-Connect testers - http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/evalce ... 83571.aspx
here are some linkz:
Windows Server 2008 RC0 Standard Edition x86
http://download.microsoft.com/download/ ... EN_DVD.iso
Windows Server 2008 RC0 Standard Edition x64
http://download.microsoft.com/download/ ... EN_DVD.iso
Windows Server 2008 RC0 Standard Edition x86
http://download.microsoft.com/download/ ... EN_DVD.iso
Windows Server 2008 RC0 Standard Edition x64
http://download.microsoft.com/download/ ... EN_DVD.iso
- Rob Jansen
- Donator
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
- Location: The Collection Book
- Contact:
no, you can also enable AeroDjRob wrote:No, this is the server version, looks like vista but with only windows classic.
"Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why."
- Rob Jansen
- Donator
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:05 pm
- Location: The Collection Book
- Contact:
- Vista Ultimate R2
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06 pm
It was never going to be called Longhorn Server, just like Vista was never going to be called Longhorn [client] - "Longhorn" was just the code name for NT6. Windows .NET Server 2003 was however going to be called that (its codename was Whistler Server, again taking the codename of the client OS upon which is what based), the .NET was only dropped at the very last minute, even later than RC2 I think.
One interesting thing is that I see in the screenshots above it still says "Version 6.0 Build 6001" - will they not change it to NT 6.1 at some point, like Server 2003 was a .1 increment greater than XP?
Edit: one more thing, Paul Thurrott has some screenshots said to be RC0 and they are still branded as Longhorn Server - is he actually running a slightly older version, or is it that they've put the 2008 branding into the Web Server SKU shown here but not the edition that he's running?
One interesting thing is that I see in the screenshots above it still says "Version 6.0 Build 6001" - will they not change it to NT 6.1 at some point, like Server 2003 was a .1 increment greater than XP?
Edit: one more thing, Paul Thurrott has some screenshots said to be RC0 and they are still branded as Longhorn Server - is he actually running a slightly older version, or is it that they've put the 2008 branding into the Web Server SKU shown here but not the edition that he's running?
Last edited by Vista Ultimate R2 on Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
hounsell
I always thought this too, but it now looks as if they aren't...Vista Ultimate R2 wrote:One interesting thing is that I see in the screenshots above it still says "Version 6.0 Build 6001" - will they not change it to NT 6.1 at some point, like Server 2003 was a .1 increment greater than XP?
I don't know why.
Good question, maybe this will be done later. Ah, about .NET Server 2003, the final name was introduced after Build 3742 which is significantly newer than RC2; so it was really renamed "in the last minute".Vista Ultimate R2 wrote:One interesting thing is that I see in the screenshots above it still says "Version 6.0 Build 6001" - will they not change it to NT 6.1 at some point, like Server 2003 was a .1 increment greater than XP?
Edit: one more thing, Paul Thurrott has some screenshots said to be RC0 and they are still branded as Longhorn Server - is he actually running a slightly older version, or is it that they've put the 2008 branding into the Web Server SKU shown here but not the edition that he's running?
Thurrott's screenshots say SP1, v.126, which tells us this is not the RC0. The RC0 is SP1, v.275 IIRC. All editions of the RC0 (SP1 v.275) are branded like the Web Server (btw, is it just me, or does "Windows Web Server 2008" sound better than "Windows Server 2008 Web (Edition)"?).